The post notes that historically, house prices and interest rates have been fairly unlinked, but household income and prices correlate strongly. If households are only looking at their ability to make monthly payments, then they are becoming seriously over leveraged. This means that they are more likely to foreclose on their home if their personal situations deteriorate and they owe more money on the house than it is worth.
So, if banks experience a larger than expected number of defaults on their home loans, who will pay? I'm guessing the tax payers via Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae. (Update It seems that MA, one of the most frothy bubble markets, has seen defaults increase).
Update winterspeak reader JT writes in arguing that
It's true that defaults have increased this year in Massachusetts, but I expect that the data is a bit difficult to read because of the massive increase in bankruptcies due to the change in bankruptcy law. (The new rules, which make it harder for people to protect certain income and property, were passed with a six month period until they phase in.)That's a great point and I think he's right. I don't think this wave of foreclosure is not caused by overleveraged homeowners because interest rates have not moved yet. It also suggests that bankrupcy fraud was more widespread than some may have thought.
See here, for instance:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_06_19-2005_06_25.shtml#1119645927
Bankruptcy filings jumped 60% in March and April compared to January and February, and almost surely as a result of the bankruptcy law and people trying to beat the changes. This makes it hard to rely on foreclosure stats, due to this confounding factor.
No comments:
Post a Comment